A code review workspace should help you connect the proposed intent, changed lines, runtime evidence, and final decision. It should not require every repository and dashboard in the organization to remain open.
Establish the review boundary
Read the pull request description, linked issue, base branch, and affected behavior. GitHub recommends building context before reviewing Files changed. Note the highest-risk files and the expected validation, then open the matching repository and branch in the editor.
Place the diff beside the local code when navigation across definitions is necessary. Keep test or build output in a terminal window, and open the product preview only when the change has user-visible behavior. Mark reviewed files only after checking the current version; GitHub clears the viewed state when a file changes.
Separate evidence from discussion
Use line comments for specific findings, suggestions for exact edits, and a review summary for cross-cutting conclusions. Check the pull request’s automated Checks and inspect dependency changes when relevant. A green check does not replace reading the source diff.
Close with a review decision
Submit Comment, Approve, or Request changes based on the repository’s review policy and the evidence observed. Stop local processes and close temporary windows afterward. Wallo can group the diff browser, editor, terminal, and preview windows, but it does not know the pull request state or review decision.